Here is an example of one of the letters:
As you may know, Kenneth Foster Jr. is slated to be executed on the thirtieth of this month. This is a miscarriage of justice, as this man is innocent of murder or conspiracy to murder. This is not to excuse his other crimes, for he should be found guilty of armed assault and theft due to the fact that he was with a group of young men when they robbed several individuals. But armed robbery is not murder and he should be punished according to the magnitude of his crime.
This email should also not be construed as trying to excuse the murder of Michael LaHood or cheapen the loss of the LaHood family. It is right and appropriate that the individual responsible for Michael's death should be punished accordingly. In fact, he already has. Mauriceo Brown, the man who shot and killed Michael LaHood, was executed by the great state of Texas on July 19, 2006.
Now I realize that as a legislator you personally do not have the power to stop this execution, but I also realize that you are in a position to access the governor and effect his decision in this case. Furthermore, it has come to my attention that an act passed in 1995 forbids the Court of Criminal Appeals from considering new evidence in death penalty cases. To me, this seems like a perversion of the law, as the primary purpose of any appellate court is to consider new evidence that might effect the decision of guilt or innocence in any given case.
This is something that you can effect personally, and I urge you to work with your fellow legislators on repealing this act as soon as possible.
Please consider my concerns as you would the concerns of any other citizen.