One day before the Texas Forensic Science Commission is scheduled to meet for the first time since Governor Rick Perry replaced the chair and all of his other appointees on the commission in order to impede the investigation into the possibility that Texas used faulty arson evidence to convict and execute Todd Willingham, the Texas Tribune has published a long article entitled “Case Open” about another Texas death row inmate claiming innocence. The article ends with the teaser “Tomorrow: Journalism students to the rescue?”, so apparently the Texas Tribune is planning to publish more information on the case tomorrow.

Hank Skinner is set for execution in Huntsville on February 24, 2010.

Hank Skinner is set to be executed for a 1993 murder he’s always maintained he didn’t commit. He wants the state to test whether his DNA matches evidence found at the scene, but prosecutors say the time to contest his conviction has come and gone. He has less than a month to change their minds.

and

Skinner’s execution date approaches as Texas faces renewed scrutiny of its famously busy death row and the science used to convict the accused. Since 1973, just 11 death row inmates have been exonerated, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, while more than 440 have been put to death. The New Yorker last year touched off a national debate about how many of those killed might have been innocent by posthumously profiling  Cameron Todd Willingham, who was executed in 2004 after a jury convicted him of killing his three young children by arson in 1991. Before Willingham was executed, according to the story, the state ignored expert reports contending that the fire may have been accidental and calling the method used to prove that it was arson “junk science.” A Texas Observer story earlier this month revealed that a psychologist the state has relied on to test the mental capacity of more than a dozen death row inmates used faulty methods to boost IQ scores so the men could meet the legal standard for the death penalty. And in Dallas County, maverick District Attorney Craig Watkins has launched aConviction Integrity Unit that has reviewed more than 400 cases in which DNA from the crime scene was still available to be tested and has discovered at least 15 wrongful convictions. 

In Skinner’s case, attorneys argue that prosecutors selectively used DNA testing to put a potentially innocent man on death row, and that the state is manipulating a 2001 law that allows post-conviction DNA testing to keep him on the path to the death chamber. “The case against him is not open and shut, it’s not ironclad,” says attorney Rob Owen, co-director of the University of Texas at Austin’s Capital Punishment Clinic. “And in a reasonable system, we ought to go the extra mile to rule out the possibility that he is an innocent man before going forward with the execution.”

Read the entire article on the website of the Texas Tribune.

A website with more information on Hank Skinner’s case: http://www.hankskinner.org

Last weekend, the San Antonio Express News wrote an editorial saying that Sharon Keller should be removed from office. Now, the Dallas Morning News Editorial Board says that Keller should also be punished, saying she “merits an official reprimand by the commission, and we hope that’s the way the last chapter is written in this judicial comedy of errors.“


Read the entire editorial here.


Excerpt:

Said the special master’s report: “Judge Keller certainly did not exhibit a model of open communication.”

Texans deserve better out of the top criminal appeals judge, especially in light of the state’s nation-leading record on capital punishment, including more than 200 executions since Keller became presiding judge in 2001. It’s a grisly business and one that demands everyone be alert until the executioner’s needle goes in the arm of the condemned.

Berchelmann didn’t let the appellate attorneys off the hook, suggesting they should have been smart enough or experienced enough to find a last-minute workaround in light of their tardy filing. The report contends they bear “the bulk of fault,” as if that calculation helps us grapple with the matter at hand – Keller’s leadership on the court.

Since the Richard case, her court has written down – for the first time – procedures to be followed in the hours before an execution nears. That in itself appears to be an admission that the court fell short in the Richard affair.

The judicial commission could find that Keller’s shortcomings are so egregious to justify her removal from office, but that’s not the way the proceedings seem to be headed. In any case, voters will have the chance to decide the question in two years.

The San Antonio Express News Editorial Board has an editorial today urging that Sharon Keller be removed from office even though the Special Master, Judge David Berchelmann, Jr, a San Antonio Republican judge, recommended that she not be further punished beyond the public humiliation she has already suffered. Here is the key paragraph:

Keller has made the Texas judicial system a national embarrassment. She is unfit to serve as the state’s highest-ranking criminal judge. Contrary to Berchelmann’s finding, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct should continue to seek her removal from the bench by the Texas Supreme Court. If the commission does not, Texas voters will have the opportunity to do so in 2012.

Below is the full editorial.

The key finding in State District Judge David Berchelmann’s report on Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Judge Sharon Keller is that she “did not violate any written or unwritten rules or laws.” And in a very narrow technical sense, this finding is correct.

Keller, the presiding judge on the state’s highest criminal appeals court, faces five charges of judicial misconduct for her actions involving the last-minute appeal for death row inmate Michael Wayne Richard. On Sept. 25, 2007, the date scheduled for Richard’s execution, the U.S. Supreme Court announced it would hear a case to determine the constitutionality of lethal injection.

Richard’s attorneys contacted Keller indicating they planned to rush an appeal based on the high court’s action. Yet despite that information and the news from Washington, Keller twice said she would not keep the court clerk’s office open past 5 p.m. to accept the appeal.

At the time, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals did not have written procedures to handle appeals on execution days. And it was on this slender reed that Berchelmann bases his advice to the Commission on Judicial Conduct that Keller should not lose her job.

But the Texas court did have, as Berchelmann acknowledges, an oral tradition that all communications from lawyers on execution day were to be made to an assigned judge. On that day, the assigned judge was Cheryl Johnson. At the very least, Keller had a responsibility to inform Johnson about the expected appeal or refer Richard’s attorneys to Johnson. She did not.

According to Berchelmann, Keller exhibited poor judgment and wasn’t a “model of open communication.” But, he wrote, her inaction did not “rise to the level of willful or purposeful incompetence.” We disagree.

Richard’s guilt is not at issue, nor is the fact that he ultimately would have been executed. What is at issue is Keller’s judgment in allowing the state to proceed with the ultimate, irreversible sanction when she was well aware that a reasonable appeal was forthcoming, and without taking the minimally reasonable step of informing the appropriate colleague. She had an ethical responsibility to see that justice was properly served.

Keller has made the Texas judicial system a national embarrassment. She is unfit to serve as the state’s highest-ranking criminal judge. Contrary to Berchelmann’s finding, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct should continue to seek her removal from the bench by the Texas Supreme Court. If the commission does not, Texas voters will have the opportunity to do so in 2012.

Sign the petition to remove Judge Sharon Keller from office.

You can view the signatures by clicking here.

In addition to signing the petition, contact the State Commission on Judicial Conduct by phone or email and tell them not to let Sharon Keller off the hook. The Republican judge at her trial has recommended that she not be further punished, but the state commission can still punish her for saying “we close at 5” and refusing to accept a late appeal on the day of a person’s execution.

Send an email to: seana.willing@scjc.state.tx.us.This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

In polite, professional language, tell Executive Director Ms Willing that Sharon Keller has brought discredit on the Texas judiciary and if they let Keller off the hook, the discredit will only get worse. Restore Integrity, Remove Keller, at least punish her with a formal reprimand.

http://www.scjc.state.tx.us/

Your communication to the State Commission will serve as support that Keller has discredited the Texas judiciary.

You can call, but they only answer the phone during business hours.

State Commission on Judicial Conduct • P. O. Box 12265 • Austin, TX 78711 Telephone: (512) 463-5533 • Toll Free: (877) 228-5750 • Fax: (512) 463-0511 • TDD: (800)-RELAY-TX

The Special Master has issued his Findings of Fact in the case of Judge Sharon Keller. The special master is Republican Judge David Berchelmann, Jr. Keller is also a Republican.