For over two decades, the hair was stored in a plastic evidence bag in the courthouse in Coldspring, Texas, cataloged as belonging to Claude Jones, who was convicted of murder in 1990 and executed 10 years later. Now, it can be relabeled: a court-ordered DNA test found Thursday that the hair actually belonged to the murder victim Allen Hilzendager. The result casts significant doubt on the validity of Jones’ conviction and his execution.
That single 1-in. (2.5 cm) strand of hair was the key to Jones’ original conviction. A truck carrying Jones and Danny Dixon did pull up in front of Hilzendager’s liquor store that night. One man got out, went inside and gunned Hilzendager down, according to two eyewitnesses across the highway (neither could see the murderer’s face). Both Jones and Dixon were certainly capable of the crime — both were on parole after serving time for murder. But there was little other firm evidence of which one had done it. Dixon accused Jones, and Jones accused Dixon. The prosecution’s star witness against Jones was a friend of Dixon’s who later said that prosecutors had coerced him into testifying.And from the beginning, the evidence was handled questionably. The hair expert at the Texas crime lab originally thought the small sample was “unsuitable for comparison” using the microscopy technology available at the time, but eventually changed his mind and decided to test it after all. Using that outdated technology — which essentially has two hairs examined side by side under a microscope — the expert then determined that the hair belonged to Jones and not Dixon.
That dubious determination went on to haunt all of Jones’ failed appeals as well. Time and again, lawyers and judges pointed to the physical evidence against Jones as a damning factor.
Except, in the end, it wasn’t. The fact that the hair was actually Hilzendager’s doesn’t mean that Jones was necessarily innocent, but it does mean that the jury convicted him — and did so quickly — based largely on false evidence. “What’s crucial to understand is that the hair was critical evidence in the case,” says Barry Scheck, whose Innocence Project, along with the Texas Observer, led the lawsuit demanding that the hair be subjected to DNA testing. “I have no doubt the conviction would’ve been reversed with these results.”Scheck points out the most poignant aspect of the story: Jones came very close to having a chance for that reversal just before he was executed. At the time, then Governor George W. Bush was on record stating that he would delay executions if there were relevant new DNA tests that could be performed. Jones’ case seemed to fit that bill — mitochondrial DNA testing was not available during his trial but was in wide use before his final appeals in 2000. Jones’ attorney at the time warned the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles that without Bush’s intervention, “the state of Texas runs the risk of executing a man despite the availability of modern technology that might exonerate him.”
The four-page memo that Bush received from his legal advisers on Dec. 7, 2000, however, made no mention of a possible new DNA test. It ended with the assertion that Jones “has had full and fair access to judicial review of his case.” Bush denied clemency, and Jones was executed that evening.
“What I’m really hoping is that when President Bush gets an opportunity to look at this,” says Scheck, “that he would acknowledge that he was blindsided and that an error was made.”
The new DNA results come during a rough patch for capital punishment in Texas. After 18 years in prison — 12 of those on death row — Anthony Graves was exonerated and walked free in October based on the opinion of a special independent prosecutor who found in favor of a 2006 reversal (stemming from a lack of evidence) of his conviction. That case, in which Graves was convicted of slaughtering a family he didn’t know based on the testimony of informants and co-defendants, had one striking similarity with the Jones case: the original prosecutors fought fiercely against any suggestions that the convictions might be invalid. As doubts over the evidence that had convicted Graves swirled in 2009, prosecutor Charles Sebesta took out full-page ads in local papers calling Graves “cold-blooded.”In Jones’ case, prosecutor Bill Burnett fought hard to destroy the hair before it could be tested, and he took his fight all the way to his grave. The pastor at his funeral in June assailed TIME’s coverage of the Jones case, in which I had argued in favor of testing, and lauded Burnett for being someone who “took a stand against some powerful people.”
(Read TIME’s coverage of the case.)After the evidence findings were revealed Thursday, Hilzendager’s brother Joe told the Associated Press that he still thinks Jones was the shooter, staying true to what he had told me in his living room almost a year ago, as he argued against testing the hair: “There’s no doubt they executed the right person.”
But Jones’ son Duane has always believed his father was wrongfully convicted. He says the results aren’t a relief and that it’s just “disappointing” to see the missed opportunities for justice.
“It saddens me because you know they spend all the taxpayers’ money fighting DNA tests,” he says. “If you’re so confident in your convictions, do the testing. You might find out something new.”
Texas Observer: DNA tests undermine key evidence in 2000 Texas execution of Claude Jones.
|
Observer Exclusive:
DNA tests undermine key evidence in 2000 death penalty case.
The Texas Observer is reporting today the results of DNA tests that raise doubts about the guilt of Claude Jones, the last Texan executed under former Gov. George W. Bush.
The DNA tests were conducted on a single strand of hair–the key evidence that sent Jones to the death chamber on Dec. 7, 2000.
At Jones’ 1990 trial, prosecutors alleged the hair–recovered from the scene of a murder at an East Texas liquor store–“matched” Claude Jones. It was the only evidence that placed Jones in the liquor store.
But the DNA tests–conducted at the request of The Texas Observer and the Innocence Project–show that the hair sample matched the victim of the shooting, and not Jones.
The new evidence in the Jones case is the result of a three-year court battle by The Texas Observer and three innocence groups–the New York-based Innocence Project, the Innocence Project of Texas and the Texas Innocence Network.
Observer editor Bob Moser will join Innocence Project director Barry Scheck, former Gov. Mark White and Claude Jones’ son Duane Jones to release the test results and discuss the case at a press conference on Friday, Nov. 12, at 10 a.m. in the Bank of America lobby at 700 Louisiana St., Houston.
In 2007, the Observer and the three innocence groups sued the San Jacinto County district attorney’s office to obtain the hair, which had never been destroyed.
In June, Judge Paul Murphy ruled in favor of the Observer and the innocence groups, and ordered the San Jacinto County district attorney’s office to hand over the hair. Prosecutors decided not to appeal Murphy’s ruling. After several months of negotiating, lawyers for the Innocence Project and the Observer reached an agreement with the San Jacinto County DA’s office to transfer the hair evidence to private labs for mitochondrial DNA testing. The Observer and the Innocence Project were represented in the suit by the Houston firm Mayer Brown.
Background of the Case
On Nov. 14, 1989, Jones and Kerry Dixon stopped at a liquor store in the East Texas town of Point Blank, about 80 miles northeast of Houston. One of the two men waited in the pickup truck while the other went inside and murdered the store’s owner, 44-year-old Allen Hilzendager, with a .357 magnum revolver. The question is which man committed the murder? Each man blamed the other.
The only physical evidence that linked Jones to the murder was the hair found on the liquor-store counter. At Jones’ 1990 trial, a forensic expert testified that the hair appeared to come from Jones. But the technology didn’t exist at the time to determine if the hair matched Jones’ DNA.
Jones always maintained his innocence. By 2000, mitochondrial DNA testing had been developed. Jones requested a stay of execution to conduct DNA tests on the strand of hair. Two Texas courts rejected his request, as did then-Gov. Bush. Documents obtained from the governor’s office show that attorneys never informed Bush that Jones was requesting DNA testing.
“It is unbelievable that the lawyers in the General Counsel’s office failed to inform the governor that Jones was seeking DNA testing on evidence that was so pivotal to the case,” said former Governor and Attorney General Mark White. “If the state is going to continue to use the death penalty, it must figure out a way to build safeguards in the system so that lapses like this don’t happen again.”
Had the hair been tested a decade ago, as Jones requested, he might still be alive. “The DNA results prove that testimony about the hair sample on which this entire case rests was just wrong,” said Scheck of the Innocence Project. “This is yet another disturbing example of a miscarriage of justice in Texas capital murder prosecutions. Unreliable forensic science and a completely inadequate post-conviction review process cost Claude Jones his life.”
With questions about the case and the Observer story, please call Dave Mann, Senior Editor, 512-477-0746 (mann@texasobserver.org) or Bob Moser, Editor, 347-891-4885 (moser@texasobserver.org).
Read the full story at texasobserver.org
Read the original Texas Observer story, Truth Hangs by a Hair.
To get a free copy of The Texas Observer, click here. Contact: Julia Austin at austin@texasobserver.org or 512-477-0746. Follow @TexasObserver on Twitter. We have 5300 followers! Join our 4000 fans on Facebook and receive a news feed with all our latest reporting. |
Be an important part of keeping investigative journalism alive at The Texas Observer. Become an Observer Partner now! |
The Observer is also available in Austin at BookPeople and other bookstores throughout the state. And if your bookstore doesn’t carry the Observer, contact us at business@texasobserver.org and mention it to bookstore employees.
|
Day 2 Update on Fundraising Campaign to Help Anthony Graves – Innocent Person Released from Texas Death Row
We are in the midst of a fundraising campaign to help Anthony Graves after his exoneration from Texas death row. We plan to deliver the funds to him before Thanksgiving, which will be his first Thanksgiving celebration as a free man in 18 years. A lot of very generous people have already donated. We thank everyone who has donated so far and we can’t wait to deliver the funds to Anthony. You can still donate.
As of 2 PM today, we had raised $1269 for Anthony Graves.
If you would like to donate to help Anthony Graves, you can make a donation to TMN using a credit card by clicking here.
On October 27, Anthony Graves became the 12th person exonerated after being wrongfully convicted and sent to Texas death row. Anthony is a completely innocent man who spent a total of 18 years locked up for a crime he had absolutely nothing to do with. Twelve of those years were spent on Texas death row in a tiny cell having his food shoved through a small slit in the door. The other years were spent in jail awaiting retrial and facing the prospect of again being sentenced to death. Anthony is now back in the loving embrace of his family and friends and soon he will enjoy his first Thanksgiving holiday as a free man in 18 years.
Update on Fundraising Campaign to Help Anthony Graves – an Innocent Man Exonerated from Texas Death Row
Less than 24 hours after launching our fundraising campaign to help Anthony Graves after his exoneration from Texas death row we have reached 98 percent of our goal of raising $1,000 for Anthony.
As of 7 PM today, we had raised $980 for Anthony.
If you would like to donate to help Anthony Graves, you can make a donation to TMN using a credit card by clicking here.
On October 27, Anthony Graves became the 12th person exonerated after being wrongfully convicted and sent to Texas death row. Anthony is a completely innocent man who spent a total of 18 years locked up for a crime he had absolutely nothing to do with. Twelve of those years were spent on Texas death row in a tiny cell having his food shoved through a small slit in the door. The other years were spent in jail awaiting retrial and facing the prospect of again being sentenced to death. Anthony is now back in the loving embrace of his family and friends and soon he will enjoy his first Thanksgiving holiday as a free man in 18 years.
Fundraising Campaign to Help Anthony Graves After His Exoneration from Texas Death Row
On October 27, Anthony Graves became the 12th person exonerated after being wrongfully convicted and sent to Texas death row. Anthony is a completely innocent man who spent a total of 18 years locked up for a crime he had absolutely nothing to do with. Twelve of those years were spent on Texas death row in a tiny cell having his food shoved through a small slit in the door. The other years were spent in jail awaiting retrial and facing the prospect of again being sentenced to death. Anthony is now back in the loving embrace of his family and friends and soon he will enjoy his first Thanksgiving holiday as a free man in 18 years.
Many amazing people were responsible for working to prove that Anthony Graves was innocent and to get him out of prison. The Houston Chronicle called them “an army of believers, a group of lawyers and students who fought to prove his innocence”. Those amazing people include lawyers and students at the Texas Innocence Network, which was founded by University of Houston law professor David Dow; defense lawyers Katherine Scardino and Jimmy Phillips; University of St. Thomas journalism professor Nicole Casarez and her students; and David Mullen and Jeff Blackburn with the Innocence Project of Texas. Of course Anthony’s family and Anthony himself also fought to prove his innocence. Journalists also played a major role in bringing attention to the plight of an innocent person on Texas death row, including Pamela Coloff at Texas Monthly in her article “Innocence Lost”. We all owe those lawyers, students and journalists a debt of gratitude for preventing another innocent person from being executed in Texas.
Now that he is free, read on to see how you can help Anthony Graves now that he has been released.
Or you can send a check to:
They’ve been there. By PEGGY O’HARE, October 30, 2010, HOUSTON CHRONICLE
If you are unable to afford a donation to Anthony right now, please keep him and his family in your thoughts, especially when you gather your family around the table on Thanksgiving Day.
- Texas Moratorium Network (TMN) is a non-profit organization with the primary goal of mobilizing statewide support for a moratorium on executions in Texas. Significant death penalty reform in Texas, including a moratorium on executions, is a viable goal if the public is educated on the death penalty system and is encouraged to contact their elected representatives to urge passage of moratorium legislation.
We hope that you will join us in this fight for fairness and social justice.Please join our email list and become one of the more than 20,000 people receiving information through our network.